A Randomized Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Recombinant Human Growth Hormone in the Treatment of Malnourished Elderly Medical Patients1

High-dose recombinant human GH (rhGH) has been shown to improve the nutritional status of malnourished older adults. It is uncertain whether low-dose rhGH is effective and whether its effect on nutritional status will lead to any improvement in physical function. There is also no data on the outcome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism Vol. 86; no. 5; pp. 1913 - 1920
Main Authors Chu, Leung-Wing, Lam, Karen S. L, Tam, Sidney C. F, Hu, Wayne J. H. C, Hui, Sau-Lan, Chiu, Anna, Chiu, Ka-Chun, Ng, Pauline
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Endocrine Society 01.05.2001
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:High-dose recombinant human GH (rhGH) has been shown to improve the nutritional status of malnourished older adults. It is uncertain whether low-dose rhGH is effective and whether its effect on nutritional status will lead to any improvement in physical function. There is also no data on the outcome after a short course of rhGH treatment. The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy of low-dose rhGH treatment for 4 weeks in malnourished elderly patients, its effect on physical functions, and the intermediate term outcome after a 4-week rhGH treatment. The study design was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted in a university teaching hospital. The patients were 19 medically stable malnourished elderly subjects. Intervention in the rhGH group was as follows: rhGH (Saizen, Serono, Switzerland) 0.09 IU/kg body weight (BW) 3 times weekly were given together with appropriate dietary intervention as prescribed by the dietitian. In the placebo group, equal volumes of normal saline per kilogram BW were given 3 times weekly together with the dietary intervention. The baseline demographic, anthropometric, nutritional, and hematological variables, measures of physical function, and insulin-like growth factor I levels in both groups were comparable. Compared with the placebo group, the GH-treated group showed a more rapid gain in BW (after 3 weeks, +1.27 ± 0.36 vs.− 0.28 ± 0.37 kg; P = 0.008), total lean body mass (change after 3 weeks by bio-impedance analysis, +1.45 ± 0.36 vs. −0.37 ± 0.48 kg; P = 0.009) and a faster improvement in 5-m walking time (decrease after 4 weeks, 23.79 ± 9.41 vs. 0.45 ± 4.62 sec; P = 0.047). The hemoglobin level rose more in the rhGH than the placebo groups (change at 8 weeks, +0.84 ± 0.34 vs. −0.42 ± 0.29 g/dL; P = 0.012). Serum albumin level also showed a greater delayed increase in the rhGH group than in the placebo group (change at 8 weeks, +5.1± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 1.2 g/dL; P = 0.023). There was no statistically significant difference for other nutritional variables. There was a greater rise in the mean serum insulin-like growth factor I level at 4 weeks in the GH than in the placebo groups (197 ± 58 vs. 54 ± 26 U/L; P = 0.034). The improvement in the rhGH group gradually diminished on follow-up and became statistically insignificant 8 weeks after stopping rhGH treatment. There were no GH-related adverse effects. Low-dose rhGH was an effective and safe adjuvant to dietary augmentation for stable malnourished elderly subjects. It led to a faster gain in total lean body mass, which was associated with greater improvement in walking speed when compared with dietary intervention alone. There were no apparent side effects.
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/jcem.86.5.7457