US, China and the Russo-Ukraine War : The Conditions for Generating a Mutually Perceived Hurting Stalemate and Consequent Ceasefire In Moscow and Kyiv

A prerequisite for a lasting ceasefire is the emergence of a prevailing view in Moscow and Kyiv that the fighting has reached a hurting stalemate. In sum, they both lose more through continuing warfare than by a ceasefire. This study applies social identity dynamics of nationalism to this escalatory...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Advanced Culture Technology(IJACT) Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 177 - 191
Main Author Benedict E. DeDominicis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 국제문화기술진흥원 31.12.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2288-7202
2288-7318
DOI10.17703/IJACT.2023.11.4.177

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A prerequisite for a lasting ceasefire is the emergence of a prevailing view in Moscow and Kyiv that the fighting has reached a hurting stalemate. In sum, they both lose more through continuing warfare than by a ceasefire. This study applies social identity dynamics of nationalism to this escalatory conflict. It generates findings that imply that China as a third-party great power intervening mediator can potentially play a pivotal role. Shifting the respective prevailing views in Moscow and Kyiv of their interaction from a zero-sum foundation requires proffering powerful economic and political third-party incentives. Effective inducement would facilitate national defense, development and prestige for Moscow as well as Kyiv. China arguably has the underutilized potential power capabilities necessary to alter the respective prevailing views of strategic relationships among the great powers within Moscow, Brussels and Washington. A prerequisite for success in striving effectively towards this strategic goal is cooperation with the Beijing despite skepticism from Washington. This study utilizes a process tracing methodological approach. It highlights that the foundations of the Russo-Ukraine war lie in the institutionalization within Euro-Atlantic integration of the Cold War assumption that the USSR was an imperialist revisionist actor. Russia is the USSR’s successor state. Moscow’s prevailing view is that Russian national self-determination was unjustly circumscribed in the multinational Soviet totalitarian Communist system. The Euro-Atlantic community is perceived as a neo-colonial imperial threat by allying with post-1991 Ukrainian nationalism at Russia’s expense. The study finds that acknowledging Eurasian regional multipolarity is necessary, if not sufficient, to coopt Beijing into a global political stabilization strategy. It functionally aims to promote international balancing to lessen potentials for horizontal as well as vertical escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict.
Bibliography:http://www.ipact.kr/eng/iconf/ijact/sub05.php
ISSN:2288-7202
2288-7318
DOI:10.17703/IJACT.2023.11.4.177