Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Routine Practice: Evidence for the Importance of “Falsification Hypotheses” in Observational Studies of Comparative Effectiveness

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 62; no. 22; pp. 2147 - 2148
Main Authors Wimmer, Neil J., Resnic, Frederic S., Mauri, Laura, Matheny, Michael E., Yeh, Robert W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 03.12.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiology. Vascular system
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Coronary heart disease
Diseases of the cardiovascular system
Femoral Artery
Heart
Humans
Logistic Models
Medical sciences
Observational Studies as Topic
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods
Radial Artery
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
Atherectomy
Observational study
Angioplasty
Coronary artery
Instrumentation therapy
Cardiovascular disease
Coronary heart disease
Stent
Hypothesis
Percutaneous route
Efficiency
Professional practice
Circulatory system
Cardiology
Comparative study
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.036