Combination of reduced folates with methotrexate or 5-fluorouracil: Comparison between 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (folinic acid) and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in vitro activities

Folinic acid ( dlFA) is increasingly used in clinical oncology. The active isomer lFA is intensively metabolized into l 5-methyltetrahydrofolate ( l 5 MTHF), the relative proportions of lFA, d FA and l 5 MTHF in blood varying considerably between oral and i.v. FA administration. The purpose of the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiochemical pharmacology Vol. 46; no. 10; pp. 1767 - 1774
Main Authors Etienne, Marie-Christine, Fischel, Jean-Louis, Formento, Patricia, Schneider, Maurice, Guillot, Thierry, Bardon, Mia, Milano, Gérard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 17.11.1993
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Folinic acid ( dlFA) is increasingly used in clinical oncology. The active isomer lFA is intensively metabolized into l 5-methyltetrahydrofolate ( l 5 MTHF), the relative proportions of lFA, d FA and l 5 MTHF in blood varying considerably between oral and i.v. FA administration. The purpose of the study was to compare the in vitro activities of pure l FA and pure l 5MTHF at equivalent drug exposure [area under curve (AUC)], taking into account their respective chemical stability in the culture medium. The in vitro growth inhibition [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) test] was evaluated on five human tumor cell lines after methotrexate (MTX)-folate or 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-folate exposures. Not only were the activities of l FA and l 5MTHF compared, but also clinically relevant mixtures of lFA + d FA + l 5MTHF corresponding to the proportions found at steady state during oral (PO mixture, 4, 39 and 57%, respectively) and i.v. administrations (i.v. mixture, 7, 81 and 12%, respectively). Measurement of folates demonstrated the marked lability of l 5MTHF (65.8% loss over 5 days in the culture medium) as compared to l FA (2.6% loss). Whatever the pharmacological model tested (MTX-folate or 5FU-folate), comparison of the folate effects at equivalent drug exposure taking into account their relative stability showed that l 5MTHF was never more potent than l FA. Moreover, a higher efficiency of l FA was demonstrated for the cell line most sensitive to 5FU; in this case, as expected, the i.v. mixture was more potent than the PO mixture. This study shows that depending on the tumor, l FA can be more potent than its main circulating metabolite l 5MTHF. Along with the limited capacity of oral absorption, the choice between oral and i.v. route for FA administration in patients should take into consideration the different pharmacological activities between l FA and l 5MTHF which suggest that the oral route is potentially detrimental to the optimal activity of the 5FU-FA combination as compared to i.v. administration.
ISSN:0006-2952
1873-2968
DOI:10.1016/0006-2952(93)90581-G