Combination of reduced folates with methotrexate or 5-fluorouracil: Comparison between 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (folinic acid) and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in vitro activities
Folinic acid ( dlFA) is increasingly used in clinical oncology. The active isomer lFA is intensively metabolized into l 5-methyltetrahydrofolate ( l 5 MTHF), the relative proportions of lFA, d FA and l 5 MTHF in blood varying considerably between oral and i.v. FA administration. The purpose of the s...
Saved in:
Published in | Biochemical pharmacology Vol. 46; no. 10; pp. 1767 - 1774 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
17.11.1993
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Folinic acid (
dlFA) is increasingly used in clinical oncology. The active isomer
lFA is intensively metabolized into
l 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (
l 5 MTHF), the relative proportions of
lFA,
d FA and
l 5 MTHF in blood varying considerably between oral and i.v. FA administration. The purpose of the study was to compare the
in vitro activities of pure
l FA and pure
l 5MTHF at equivalent drug exposure [area under curve (AUC)], taking into account their respective chemical stability in the culture medium. The
in vitro growth inhibition [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) test] was evaluated on five human tumor cell lines after methotrexate (MTX)-folate or 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-folate exposures. Not only were the activities of
l FA and
l 5MTHF compared, but also clinically relevant mixtures of
lFA +
d FA +
l 5MTHF corresponding to the proportions found at steady state during oral (PO mixture, 4, 39 and 57%, respectively) and i.v. administrations (i.v. mixture, 7, 81 and 12%, respectively). Measurement of folates demonstrated the marked lability of
l 5MTHF (65.8% loss over 5 days in the culture medium) as compared to
l FA (2.6% loss). Whatever the pharmacological model tested (MTX-folate or 5FU-folate), comparison of the folate effects at equivalent drug exposure taking into account their relative stability showed that
l 5MTHF was never more potent than
l FA. Moreover, a higher efficiency of
l FA was demonstrated for the cell line most sensitive to 5FU; in this case, as expected, the i.v. mixture was more potent than the PO mixture. This study shows that depending on the tumor,
l FA can be more potent than its main circulating metabolite
l 5MTHF. Along with the limited capacity of oral absorption, the choice between oral and i.v. route for FA administration in patients should take into consideration the different pharmacological activities between
l FA and
l 5MTHF which suggest that the oral route is potentially detrimental to the optimal activity of the 5FU-FA combination as compared to i.v. administration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-2952 1873-2968 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0006-2952(93)90581-G |