The Formulation of Rational Choice
The description of a rational person in traditional economic theory, or standard game theory, is considered. As Myerson (1991) presents the prevailing view of the matter, a decision-maker is rational if he makes decisions consistently in pursuit of his own objectives. Myerson goes on to explain that...
Saved in:
Published in | The American economic review Vol. 84; no. 2; pp. 385 - 390 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Menasha, Wis
American Economic Association
01.05.1994
American Economic Assoc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The description of a rational person in traditional economic theory, or standard game theory, is considered. As Myerson (1991) presents the prevailing view of the matter, a decision-maker is rational if he makes decisions consistently in pursuit of his own objectives. Myerson goes on to explain that it is assumed that each player's objective is to maximize the expected value of his own payoff, which is measured in some utility scale. The payoff function is a real-valued representation of the person's preferences over the outcomes. Rationality is seen as intelligently maximizing such a payoff function, using all the available instruments, subject to feasibility. This canonical formulation of rational choice in standard theory is critically scrutinized, identifying distinct inadequacies in different contexts. The need for context-dependent parametric variations in the characterization of rational choice is outlined. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |