The conflicts between grounded theory requirements and institutional requirements for scientific research

The authors examined the conflicts between grounded theory (GT) requirements and institutional requirements for scientific research such as they were experienced by researchers and students. The overview of how GT was originally conceived served as background to the analysis of the problems GT users...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQualitative report Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 396 - 414
Main Authors Luckerhoff, Jason, Guillemette, Francois
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Fort Lauderdale Nova Southeastern University, Inc 01.03.2011
The Qualitative Report
Nova Southeastern University
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The authors examined the conflicts between grounded theory (GT) requirements and institutional requirements for scientific research such as they were experienced by researchers and students. The overview of how GT was originally conceived served as background to the analysis of the problems GT users often faced when they submitted research projects to academic or granting committees. Three especially contentious aspects that arose from the data were discussed: the circularity of the general research method, the suspension of references to theoretical frameworks, and theoretical sampling. Participants to this study have explored some possibilities to overcome those conflicts. Key Words: Methodology, Grounded Theory, Scientific Research, and Conflicts
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1052-0147
2160-3715