The conflicts between grounded theory requirements and institutional requirements for scientific research
The authors examined the conflicts between grounded theory (GT) requirements and institutional requirements for scientific research such as they were experienced by researchers and students. The overview of how GT was originally conceived served as background to the analysis of the problems GT users...
Saved in:
Published in | Qualitative report Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 396 - 414 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Fort Lauderdale
Nova Southeastern University, Inc
01.03.2011
The Qualitative Report Nova Southeastern University |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The authors examined the conflicts between grounded theory (GT) requirements and institutional requirements for scientific research such as they were experienced by researchers and students. The overview of how GT was originally conceived served as background to the analysis of the problems GT users often faced when they submitted research projects to academic or granting committees. Three especially contentious aspects that arose from the data were discussed: the circularity of the general research method, the suspension of references to theoretical frameworks, and theoretical sampling. Participants to this study have explored some possibilities to overcome those conflicts. Key Words: Methodology, Grounded Theory, Scientific Research, and Conflicts |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1052-0147 2160-3715 |