Basic geometric analysis of 3-D chip forms in metal cutting.: Part 1: determining up-curl and side-curl radii

The works of Nakayama et al. represent the prevailing view on how the geometry of 3-D helical chip relates to the radii of its up-curl and side-curl. The view is re-examined in this paper and it is shown that the corresponding definitions of the radii are ambiguous. Six sets of alternative hypotheti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of machine tools & manufacture Vol. 39; no. 5; pp. 751 - 769
Main Authors Kharkevich, A., K. Venuvinod, Patri
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.05.1999
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The works of Nakayama et al. represent the prevailing view on how the geometry of 3-D helical chip relates to the radii of its up-curl and side-curl. The view is re-examined in this paper and it is shown that the corresponding definitions of the radii are ambiguous. Six sets of alternative hypothetical definitions of up-curl and side-curl radii, which are consistent and plausible when examined from the viewpoints of 2-D up-curl and side-curl, are identified and the respective expressions are derived from a geometric analysis of 3-D chip. The hypotheses are tested using six criteria. It is found that the expressions for the radii of up-curl and side-curl proposed by Nakayama et al. do not satisfy one of the criteria whereas a new solution satisfies all the criteria. Part 2 extends the 3-D geometric analysis and discovers a number of new implications.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0890-6955
1879-2170
DOI:10.1016/S0890-6955(98)00065-0