Amidst Multiple Theories of Learning in Mathematics Education
Currently, there are more theories of learning in use in mathematics education research than ever before (Lerman & Tsatsaroni, 2004). Although this is a positive sign for the field, it also has brought with it a set of challenges. In this article, I identify some of these challenges and consider...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal for research in mathematics education Vol. 40; no. 5; pp. 477 - 490 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
01.11.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Currently, there are more theories of learning in use in mathematics education research than ever before (Lerman & Tsatsaroni, 2004). Although this is a positive sign for the field, it also has brought with it a set of challenges. In this article, I identify some of these challenges and consider how mathematics education researchers might think about, and work with, the multiple theories available. I present alternatives to views of the competition or supersession of theories and indicate the kinds of discussions that will support effective theory use in mathematics education research. I describe the potential for mathematics education researchers to make informed, justified choices of a theory or theories to address particular research agendas. (Contains 10 footnotes.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-8251 |