Localization of the third heparin-binding site in the human complement regulator factor H 1

Complement factor H (fH) plays a pivotal role in regulating the alternative pathway, allowing complement activation to proceed on foreign surfaces, whilst protecting surrounding host cell surfaces from complement-mediated damage. Host cell recognition is mediated by polyanions such as sialic acid an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular immunology Vol. 43; no. 10; pp. 1624 - 1632
Main Authors Ormsby, Rebecca J., Jokiranta, T. Sakari, Duthy, Thomas G., Griggs, Kim M., Sadlon, Tania A., Giannakis, Eleni, Gordon, David L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Complement factor H (fH) plays a pivotal role in regulating the alternative pathway, allowing complement activation to proceed on foreign surfaces, whilst protecting surrounding host cell surfaces from complement-mediated damage. Host cell recognition is mediated by polyanions such as sialic acid and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which promote a high affinity interaction between fH and C3b deposited on host cell surfaces. Factor H is composed of 20 short consensus repeats (SCRs); two heparin-binding sites have been identified within SCR 7 and SCR 20 and a third site is thought to exist within or near SCR 13. Using an extensive series of recombinant fH fragments and heparin affinity chromatography, we have localized the third heparin-binding domain to SCR 9. A recombinant fH fragment containing both SCR 7 and SCR 9 exhibited higher affinity for heparin than SCR 7 alone, suggesting that the individual heparin-binding sites interact simultaneously with heparin to create a higher avidity interaction. Recombinant fragments containing SCR 9 bound to endothelial cells, indicating that this domain is capable of interacting with polyanions within a physiologically relevant environment. In addition, the three heparin-binding sites exhibited differences in their specificity for certain GAGs, suggesting that the individual binding domains may possess separate GAG recognition functions.
ISSN:0161-5890
1872-9142
DOI:10.1016/j.molimm.2005.09.012