The 2.1 Å Crystal Structure of the Far-red Fluorescent Protein HcRed: Inherent Conformational Flexibility of the Chromophore

We have determined the crystal structure of HcRed, a far-red fluorescent protein isolated from Heteractis crispa, to 2.1 Å resolution. HcRed was observed to form a dimer, in contrast to the monomeric form of green fluorescent protein (GFP) or the tetrameric forms of the GFP-like proteins (eqFP611, R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of molecular biology Vol. 349; no. 1; pp. 223 - 237
Main Authors Wilmann, Pascal G., Petersen, Jan, Pettikiriarachchi, Anne, Buckle, Ashley M., Smith, Sean C., Olsen, Seth, Perugini, Matthew A., Devenish, Rodney J., Prescott, Mark, Rossjohn, Jamie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 27.05.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We have determined the crystal structure of HcRed, a far-red fluorescent protein isolated from Heteractis crispa, to 2.1 Å resolution. HcRed was observed to form a dimer, in contrast to the monomeric form of green fluorescent protein (GFP) or the tetrameric forms of the GFP-like proteins (eqFP611, Rtms5 and DsRed). Unlike the well-defined chromophore conformation observed in GFP and the GFP-like proteins, the HcRed chromophore was observed to be considerably mobile. Within the HcRed structure, the cyclic tripeptide chromophore, Glu 64-Tyr 65-Gly 66, was observed to adopt both a cis coplanar and a trans non-coplanar conformation. As a result of these two conformations, the hydroxyphenyl moiety of the chromophore makes distinct interactions within the interior of the β-can. These data together with a quantum chemical model of the chromophore, suggest the cis coplanar conformation to be consistent with the fluorescent properties of HcRed, and the trans non-coplanar conformation to be consistent with non-fluorescent properties of hcCP, the chromoprotein parent of HcRed. Moreover, within the GFP-like family, it appears that where conformational freedom is permissible then flexibility in the chromophore conformation is possible.
ISSN:0022-2836
1089-8638
DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.020