P02-70 - The new rasch-based depression screening (DESC): Evaluation and validation in different patient groups and a large German population sample

Introduction Comorbid depression in somatic illness is highly prevalent. However, most depression questionnaires show violation of unidimensionality and hypersensitivity of items. Objectives The Depression Screening (DESC) is a new self-rating scale for the measurement of depression severity that we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean psychiatry Vol. 26; p. 665
Main Authors Norra, C, Böcker, M, Wirtz, M, Glaesmer, H, Brähler, E, Gauggel, S, Forkmann, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier SAS 2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Comorbid depression in somatic illness is highly prevalent. However, most depression questionnaires show violation of unidimensionality and hypersensitivity of items. Objectives The Depression Screening (DESC) is a new self-rating scale for the measurement of depression severity that we developed from a calibrated Rasch-homogeneous item bank (N = 367) to improve short depression assessment in patients beyond psychiatric settings. Aim To present data for both parallel forms (10 questions each) of the DESC, and to examine its Rasch model qualities in different patient groups and a representative German general population sample. Methods Patient groups with depression, heart disease, neurological or otolaryngological disease (N = 333) were investigated with the DESC accompanied by diagnostic interviews and established depression scales. The demographic sample (N = 2509) was interviewed face to face, too. Adherence to Rasch model assumptions was determined with analysis of model fit, and further measures. Norm values were calculated. Results Both DESC versions feature different but highly correlated item sets. Cut-off scores with good sensitivity (0.82, 0.81) and specificity (0.78, 0.77) for the diagnosis of an affective disorder were developed with ROC analyses. No serious Differential Item Functioning in Rasch analyses for both scales was found. In the German validation sample the Rasch dimension “depression” explained 68.5% and 69.3% respectively of the variance. Validity was determined through sufficient intercorrelations with other scales (e.g. BDI, HADS). Conclusions Our studies support the good psychometric RASCH qualities of both DESC forms and offer important advancements in depression screening being of use for time-limited clinical and research applications.
ISSN:0924-9338
1778-3585
DOI:10.1016/S0924-9338(11)72371-9