P01-53 Are there differences between primary psicosis and substance-induced psicosis?

Introduction Substance-induced psychoses (SIP) are associated with greater conjugal ties, greater substance dependence, homelessness, parental substance abuse, poorer family support and visual hallucinations, while primary psychotic disorders (PP) have greater symptom severity. Objective To describe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean psychiatry Vol. 24; p. S441
Main Authors Digon, L. Diaz, Sanvisens, D. Martinez, Fernandez, L. Morro, Codina, G. Mateu, Torres, A. Merino, Melich, M. Torrens
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Masson SAS 2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Substance-induced psychoses (SIP) are associated with greater conjugal ties, greater substance dependence, homelessness, parental substance abuse, poorer family support and visual hallucinations, while primary psychotic disorders (PP) have greater symptom severity. Objective To describe differential characteristics between PP and SIP in a dual diagnosis unit. Method We collected sociodemographic, employment data, admission reasons, family substance abuse and main drug of abuse. Results • 23 patients were admitted with psychosis (87% males; mean age 35,6±10,1). Two groups were performed: PP (N=12) and SIP (N=11). • Mean length of admission was 17,78±13,17 days. Most prevalent co-occurrent diagnoses were psychotic disorders-cocaine use disorders (43,5%). • The only significant difference between PP and SIP was shorter length of admission in SIP (days: mean [s.d]) (26,6±14,9 vs. 13,8±7,5; p< 0.05). Other variables studied were: (1) main reasons for admission: hallucinations/delusions (33,3% vs. 90,9%), suicide ideation (33,3% vs. 0%); (2) main drug of abuse: cocaine (50% vs. 45,5%), alcohol (33,3% vs. 0%), psychoestimulants (0% vs. 27,3%), cannabis (8,3% vs. 18,2%); (3) marital status: married/cohabiting (25% vs. 36,4%), divorced (16,7% vs. 0%), single (58,3% vs. 63,6%); (4) employment: employed (33,3% vs. 50%) and unemployed (66,7% vs. 50%); (5) age, years: mean (s.d): 37,8 (10,6) vs 33,2 (9,5); (6) parental substance abuse (65,7% vs. 83,3%). Conclusions • No significant differences were found between both groups (PP vs. SIP) except for shorter length of admission in SIP. • The most frequent co-ocurrent diagnosis was psychotic disorder+cocaine use disorder.
ISSN:0924-9338
1778-3585
DOI:10.1016/S0924-9338(09)70674-1