Analysis of Scholars' Comments on Breaking Through the Evaluation Criteria Based on"Four Only"

• Published in: Nongye tushu qingbao xuekan Vol. 33; no. 10; pp. 46 - 58
• Main Authors: LIU, Qian, ZHENG Sijia, GUI Chenjun, WANG, Xuefeng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Chinese
• Published: Beijing Agricultural Information Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences 01.10.2021; Editorial Department of Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
• Subjects: breaking the four only|breaking the only sci|opinion analysis|policy recommendation|scientific evaluation
• ISSN: 1002-1248
• DOI: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-0961

[Purpose/Significance] The publication of policy documents of breaking through the evaluation criteria based on" only thesis, only professional title, only academic degree, only awards" and "only SCI " has triggered extensive discussions among academic researchers. Scholars' discussions are logical and thorough, which can be used as a reference for the further improvement of talent evaluation and institutional evaluation policies. [Methods/Process] This paper comprehensively adopted the literature research method, analyzed scholars' views and comments on policy documents, classified scholars' concerns, and proposed suggestions based on the current status of scientific research evaluation. [Results/Conclusions] The paper proposed to improve the classification and evaluation methods, promote the implementation of the representative work system, optimize the allocation of scientific research resources, strengthen the cultivation of domestic journals, establish a comprehensive evaluation system, and strengthen ac