Implications of human–wildlife conflict on the diet of an endangered avian top predator in the northern Andes

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 13077 - 11
• Main Authors: Restrepo-Cardona, Juan Sebastián, Kohn, Sebastián, Renjifo, Luis Miguel, Vásquez-Restrepo, Juan D., Zuluaga, Santiago, Vargas, Félix Hernán, Narváez, Fabricio, Salagaje, Luis A., Recalde, Abel, Gaitán-López, Erik Camilo, Salazar, Andy, Hull, Vanessa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 06.06.2024; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/158; 631/158/672; Animals; Animals, Wild; Biomass; Carnivores; Chickens - physiology; Colombia; Conservation; Conservation of Natural Resources; Diet; Eagles - physiology; Ecuador; Endangered Species; Feeding Behavior; Forest management; Forests; Galliformes; Generalized linear models; Human-environment relationship; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; multidisciplinary; Nesting; Nests; Pasture; Poultry; Poultry production; Predation; Predatory Behavior - physiology; Prey; Psychological assessment; Rural areas; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Spizaetus isidori; Wildlife; Ecuador; Colombia
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63947-3

Conflicts between rural people and the Endangered Black-and-chestnut Eagle ( Spizaetus isidori ) are a prominent conservation concern in the northern Andes, as at least 60 eagles were poached between 2000 and 2022 in response to poultry predation. Here, we conducted direct observations to analyze the Black-and-chestnut Eagle diet and evaluated how forest cover affects the feeding habits of the species during nestling-rearing periods in 16 nests located in different human-transformed Andean landscapes of Ecuador and Colombia. We analyzed 853 prey items (46 species) delivered to nestlings. We used Generalized Linear Models to test whether the percent forest cover calculated within varying buffer distances around each nest and linear distances from the nest to the nearest settlement and pasture areas were predictors of diet diversity and biomass contribution of prey. Forest cover was not a factor that affected the consumption of poultry; however, the eagle regularly preyed on chickens ( Gallus gallus ) (i.e., domestic Galliformes) which were consumed by 15 of the 16 eagle pairs, with biomass contributions (14.57% ± 10.55) representing 0.6–37% of the total prey consumed. The Black-and-chestnut Eagle is an adaptable generalist able to switch from mammalian carnivores to guans (i.e., wild Galliformes) in human-dominated landscapes, and eagles nesting in sites with low forest cover had a less diverse diet than those in areas with more intact forests. Management actions for the conservation of this avian top predator require studies on the eagle’s diet in areas where human persecution is suspected or documented, but also maintaining forest cover for the wild prey of the species, development of socio-economic and psychological assessments on the drivers behind human-eagle conflicts, and the strengthening of technical capacities of rural communities, such as appropriate poultry management.