Tafasitamab for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final 5-year efficacy and safety findings in the phase II L-MIND study

Tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 immunotherapy, is used with lenalidomide for patients with autologous stem cell transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on the results of the phase II L-MIND study (NCT02399085). We report the final 5-year analysis of this study. Eighty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHaematologica (Roma) Vol. 109; no. 2; pp. 553 - 566
Main Authors Duell, Johannes, Abrisqueta, Pau, Andre, Marc, Gaidano, Gianluca, Gonzales-Barca, Eva, Jurczak, Wojciech, Kalakonda, Nagesh, Liberati, Anna Marina, Maddocks, Kami J, Menne, Tobias, Nagy, Zsolt, Tournilhac, Olivier, Kuffer, Christian, Bakuli, Abhishek, Amin, Aasim, Gurbanov, Konstantin, Salles, Gilles
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Italy Fondazione Ferrata Storti 01.02.2024
Ferrata Storti Foundation
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 immunotherapy, is used with lenalidomide for patients with autologous stem cell transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on the results of the phase II L-MIND study (NCT02399085). We report the final 5-year analysis of this study. Eighty patients ≥18 years who had received one to three prior systemic therapies, and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 received up to 12 cycles of co-administered tafasitamab and lenalidomide, followed by tafasitamab monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the best objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory analyses evaluated efficacy endpoints by prior lines of therapy. At data cutoff on November 14, 2022, the objective response rate was 57.5%, with a complete response rate of 41.3% (n=33), which was consistent with prior analyses. With a median follow-up of 44.0 months, the median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 5.7-45.7) with a median follow-up of 45.6 months. The median overall survival was 33.5 months (95% CI: 18.3-not reached) with a median follow-up of 65.6 months. Patients who had received one prior line of therapy (n=40) showed a higher objective response rate (67.5%; 52.5% complete responses) compared to patients who had received two or more prior lines of therapy (n=40; 47.5%; 30% complete responses), but the median duration of response was not reached in either subgroup. Other exploratory analyses revealed consistent long-term efficacy results across subgroups. Adverse events were consistent with those described in previous reports, were manageable, and their frequency decreased during tafasitamab monotherapy, with no new safety concerns. This final 5-year analysis of L-MIND demonstrates that the immunotherapy combination of tafasitamab and lenalidomide is well tolerated and has long-term clinical benefit with durable responses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Disclosures
JD has received research funding from MorphoSys AG and Regeneron. PA has received honoraria from Janssen, Celgene, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, and Incyte; has played a consulting or advisory role for Janssen, Celgene, AbbVie, and AstraZeneca; and participated in speakers’ bureau for Janssen, Celgene, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, and Gilead. MA has sat on advisory boards for Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, Gilead, and Incyte; has received research grants from Roche, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda; and has received travel grants from Roche, Bristol Myers Squib, Celgene, Gilead, AbbVie, and AstraZeneca. GG has sat on advisory boards for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Incyte, Janssen, and Roche and participated in speakers’ bureau for AbbVie and Janssen. EG-B has provided consultancy for Janssen, AbbVie, Gilead, Kiowa, EUSAPharma, Incyte, Lilly, and BeiGene; participated in speakers’ bureau for Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Kiowa, Roche, EUSAPharma, Incyte, and BeiGene; and received travel costs from Janssen, AbbVie, and EUSAPharma. WJ has provided consulting/advisory services for Mei Pharma, Debiopharm, Loxo, Takeda, AstraZeneca, BeiGene; and has received research funding from GSK, Acerta, BeiGene, Nordic Nanovector, Incyte, Debiopharm, Incyte, Genentech, Janssen, Loxo, Mei Pharma, MorphoSys AG, Takeda, and TG Therapeutics. AML has received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, Celgene, AbbVie, and Amgen; provided consulting or advisory services for Incyte; and received research funding from Novartis, Janssen, AbbVie, Roche, Amgen, Sanofi Genzyme, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, Incyte, Pfizer, IQVIA, Doxopharma, Verastem, BeiGene, Oncopeptides, Karyopharm, Archigen, CTI BioPharma, Debiopharm, MorphoSys AG, FibroGen, Mei Pharma, Regeneron, and Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Spa. KJM has received honoraria from Pharmacyclics, MorphoSys AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma/ Gilead Company, ADC Therapeutics, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genmab, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Incyte; and research funding from Pharmacyclics, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb. TM has received travel grants from Amgen, Jazz, Pfizer, Bayer, Kyowa Kirin, Celgene/BMS, Kite/Gilead, Janssen, and Takeda; honoraria for advisory board meetings from Kite/Gilead, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Atara, Roche, and Janssen; honoraria for lectures from Kite/Gilead, Takeda, Janssen, Roche, Servier, Novartis, Celgene/BMS, and Pfizer; and research funding from Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. ZN has provided consulting/advisory services for Takeda, Janssen, AbbVie, Roche, Amgen, Servier, and Astellas. OT has provided consulting/advisory services for Takeda, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Incyte, Janssen, Gilead, AbbVie, Roche, Sandoz, and Blueprint. CK and KG are employees of MorphoSys AG. AB is an employee of MorphoSys AG and a statistical consultant for Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany. AA is an employee of MorphoSys AG and holds stock in Paion AG. GS has provided consulting services for Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, MorphoSys AG, Epizyme, Alimera Sciences, Genmab, Debiopharm Group, VelosBio, Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGene, Miltenyi Biotec, and Ipsen; and has received honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Janssen, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, AbbVie, and MorphoSys AG.
Contributions
JD, PA, MA, GG, EG-B, WJ, NK, AML, KJM, TM, ZN, OT, CK, AB, AA, KG, and GS conceived the study. JD, PA, MA, GG, EG-B, WJ, NK, AML, KJM, TM, ZN, OT, KG and GS were responsible for the investigation. AB, CK, AA, and KG were responsible for methodology and resources. AA was the project administrator. AA, AB, JD, CK, and KG supervised the study, and curated and analyzed the data. AB was responsible for validation. JD, AB, CK, AA, KG, and NK wrote the original draft of the article. JD, PA, MA, GG, EG-B, WJ, NK, AML, KJM, TM, ZN, OT, CK, AB, AA, KG, and GS reviewed and edited the original draft.
Data-sharing requests by qualified researchers pertaining to the L-MIND study will be considered only for non-commercial use on a case-by-case basis (to be approved by MorphoSys; contact Daniel.Moik@morphosys.com), starting 12 months after acceptance of the manuscript and until 36 months thereafter. Approval may be subject to a data access agreement.
Data-sharing statement
ISSN:1592-8721
0390-6078
1592-8721
DOI:10.3324/haematol.2023.283480