Numerical Investigation of the Seismic-Induced Rocking Behavior of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Bridge Piers

• Published in: Buildings (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 6; p. 1833
• Main Authors: Bao, Zehua, Xu, Wenjing, Gao, Haoyuan, Zhong, Xueqi, Li, Jianzhong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.06.2024
• Subjects: Bridge piers; Bridges; Calibration; Comparative analysis; Concrete; Contact springs; cyclic response; Design; Earthquakes; Highway construction; Investigations; Machine learning; Mathematical models; Numerical analysis; Numerical models; Parametric analysis; Piers; Plasticity; Post-tensioning; Reinforced concrete; rocking; Seismic activity; seismic performance; Seismic response; Shake table tests; Simulation methods; Springs (elastic); Stiffness; Stress concentration; unbonded post-tensioning; China
• ISSN: 2075-5309; 2075-5309
• DOI: 10.3390/buildings14061833

It is essential and convenient to use accurate and validated numerical models to simulate the seismic performance of post-tensioned (PT) rocking bridge piers, with a particular emphasis on accurately capturing rocking behavior. The primary contribution of this study is a comparison of the effectiveness of four commonly used numerical base rocking models (namely, the lumped plasticity (LP) model and the multi-contact spring (MCS) models with linear elastic (MCS-LE), bilinear elastic–plastic (MCS-EP) and nonlinear plastic (MCS-NP) material behavior, respectively) in modeling both the cyclic and seismic responses of PT rocking bridge piers. Also, this study validates the 3D contact stiffness equation for numerical models and assesses the differences between the dynamic and static stiffness values of the contact springs. Both quasi-static and shaking table tests of typical PT rocking piers are adopted to calibrate/validate these numerical models. These models describing the PT rocking piers’ seismic performance are formulated and calibrated, showing good agreement with test results for test specimens. Additionally, the suggested values of model spring stiffness for dynamic and quasi-static analyses are identified by parametric analysis. All base rocking models can predict the pier’s cyclic and seismic behavior after the calibration of contact spring stiffness values. The recommended contact stiffness for the dynamic analysis of PT rocking piers is smaller than that used for the quasi-static analysis. The results and findings provide a valuable reference and solution for the numerical simulation of PT rocking piers.