Emergency contraception in university students: prevalence of use and knowledge gaps
OBJECTIVEInvestigate prevalence of use and knowledge about emergency contraception (EC) among female university students from two higher education institutions. METHODSCross-sectional study with 1,740 undergraduates in the city of Santa Maria (RS), from May to October 2017. Information was collected...
Saved in:
Published in | Revista de saúde pública Vol. 55; p. 74 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English Portuguese |
Published |
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
01.01.2021
Universidade de São Paulo |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | OBJECTIVEInvestigate prevalence of use and knowledge about emergency contraception (EC) among female university students from two higher education institutions. METHODSCross-sectional study with 1,740 undergraduates in the city of Santa Maria (RS), from May to October 2017. Information was collected in a semi-structured and self-administered 24-question questionnaire. The investigated variables were grouped into sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behavior, and knowledge of EC. Logistic regression was used for univariate and multivariate analysis, considering variables that presented p < 0.05. The model was adjusted using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTSThe prevalence of EC use among undergraduates was 52.9%. However, only 11.9% of respondents received guidance on EC, especially on how to use it. Only 0.2% of the participants marked 120 hours as the maximum time of use, and 25.7% considered the EC to be abortive. EC use was associated with the age of first sexual intercourse. CONCLUSIONEC use had a high prevalence among female university students, however, several gaps in method knowledge still exists and it demonstrates the importance of discussing this issue earlier and planning actions of an informative nature. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Authors’ Contribution: Study design and planning: JB, CYK, CSB, EFR, VMLB. Data collection, analysis and interpretation: JB, CYK, CSB, JK, LMVC, EFR, VMLB. Preparation or revision of the manuscript: JB, CYK, CSB, JK, LMVC, EFR, VMLB. Final version approval: JB, CYK, CSB, JK, LMVC, EFR, VMLB. Public responsibility for the content of the article: JB, CYK, CSB, JK, LMVC, EFR, VMLB. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. |
ISSN: | 0034-8910 1518-8787 1518-8787 |
DOI: | 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003076 |