Solus Secedo and Sapere Aude: Cartesian Meditation as Kantian Enlightenment

Recently Samuel Fleischacker has developed Kant’s model of enlightenment as a “minimalist enlightenment” in the tradition of a relatively thin proceduralism focused on the form of public debate and interaction. I want to discuss the possibility that such a minimalism, endorsed by Fleischacker, Haber...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCon-textos kantianos Vol. 1; no. 2; pp. 261 - 279
Main Author Rajiva, Suma
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ediciones Complutense (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2386-7655
2386-7655
DOI10.5281/zenodo.33976

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recently Samuel Fleischacker has developed Kant’s model of enlightenment as a “minimalist enlightenment” in the tradition of a relatively thin proceduralism focused on the form of public debate and interaction. I want to discuss the possibility that such a minimalism, endorsed by Fleischacker, Habermas, Rawls, and others, benefits from a metaphysics of critical individual subjectivity as a prerequisite for the social proceduralism of the minimalist enlightenment. I argue that Kant’s enlightenment, metaphysically thicker than much contemporary proceduralism, constitutes a recovery and transformation of a subjective interiority deeply Cartesian in spirit and central to the reciprocity of the community of subjects in What is Enlightenment. This opens a space for a site of resistance to the social. Descartes’ solus secedo describes the analogical space of such a resistance for Kant’s sapere aude. The Meditations thus point forward implicitly to how a rational subject might achieve critical distance from tradition in its various forms, epistemic, ethical, moral, and political.
ISSN:2386-7655
2386-7655
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.33976