Solus Secedo and Sapere Aude: Cartesian Meditation as Kantian Enlightenment
Recently Samuel Fleischacker has developed Kant’s model of enlightenment as a “minimalist enlightenment” in the tradition of a relatively thin proceduralism focused on the form of public debate and interaction. I want to discuss the possibility that such a minimalism, endorsed by Fleischacker, Haber...
Saved in:
Published in | Con-textos kantianos Vol. 1; no. 2; pp. 261 - 279 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ediciones Complutense (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
01.11.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2386-7655 2386-7655 |
DOI | 10.5281/zenodo.33976 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Recently Samuel Fleischacker has developed Kant’s model of enlightenment as a “minimalist enlightenment” in the tradition of a relatively thin proceduralism focused on the form of public debate and interaction. I want to discuss the possibility that such a minimalism, endorsed by Fleischacker, Habermas, Rawls, and others, benefits from a metaphysics of critical individual subjectivity as a prerequisite for the social proceduralism of the minimalist enlightenment. I argue that Kant’s enlightenment, metaphysically thicker than much contemporary proceduralism, constitutes a recovery and transformation of a subjective interiority deeply Cartesian in spirit and central to the reciprocity of the community of subjects in What is Enlightenment. This opens a space for a site of resistance to the social. Descartes’ solus secedo describes the analogical space of such a resistance for Kant’s sapere aude. The Meditations thus point forward implicitly to how a rational subject might achieve critical distance from tradition in its various forms, epistemic, ethical, moral, and political. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2386-7655 2386-7655 |
DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.33976 |