Stability Analysis of “321” Prefabricated Highway Steel Truss Bridge

• Published in: Buildings (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 6; p. 1626
• Main Authors: He, Haifang, Zhou, Yulong, Cheng, Shoushan, An, Ning, Liu, Hongyi, Fei, Zhixuan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.06.2024
• Subjects: Analysis; Bending stresses; Bridge loads; Bridges; Buckling; buckling instability; Disaster relief; Earthquakes; Failure analysis; Finite element analysis; Inquests; internal force analysis; Internal forces; Load; Mechanical properties; Metal fatigue; Numerical analysis; Out of plane bending; prefabricated; Prefabrication; Safety engineering; Stability analysis; Steel; Steel bridges; Steel structures; steel truss bridge; Stiffening; Traffic capacity; Traffic flow; Truss bridges; China
• ISSN: 2075-5309; 2075-5309
• DOI: 10.3390/buildings14061626

The “321” prefabricated highway steel truss bridge is widely used for highway rescue, disaster relief, and emergency traffic. This paper uses a 33 m double-row monolayer “321” prefabricated highway steel truss bridge to analyze its mechanical properties and component stability. The actual traffic flow capacity of a total weight of 53.32 tons is used in this study. The results show that the maximum internal force in the truss chord (including the stiffening chord) occurs in the middle span section when a centrally distributed load is applied. Meanwhile, the maximum internal force of truss diagonal members and truss vertical bars appears at the fulcrum section. Under the eccentrically distributed load, the maximum internal forces of truss chords (including stiffening chords) appear in the middle span section, which is closest to the vehicle load, while the maximum internal forces of truss diagonal members and truss vertical bars appear in the fulcrum section, which is closest to the vehicle load. While the maximum internal forces under the eccentrically distributed load are greater than the maximum internal forces under the centered-layout load, under the vehicle load, truss chords (including stiffening chords) are prone to buckling instability, and the buckling mode is mainly reverse out-of-plane buckling. The inclined members of the truss are prone to buckling instability, and the buckling mode is mainly the combination of out-of-plane bending and two-way out-of-plane bending. Truss vertical bars have good stability and are not easy to buckle. The main conclusions of this paper can provide references for the optimal design and operation safety of prefabricated highway steel truss bridges.