SENSIBILIDADES Y REARTICULACIONES HUMANAS Y NO HUMANAS EN LA NARRATIVA DE CRISTINA RIVERA GARZA

I suggest a reflection upon two books that explore a reconstitution and an enlargement of the human and non-human living. Cristina Rivera Garza's El mal de la taiga (2012) and Había mucha neblina o humo o no sé qué (2016) offer imaginative openings that depose the individual subject as a paradi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnclajes : revista del Instituto de Análisis Semiótico del Discurso Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 189 - 203
Main Author Keizman, Betina
Format Journal Article
LanguageSpanish
Published Santa Rosa Universidad Nacional de la Pampa 01.09.2020
Instituto de Investigaciones Literarias y Discursivas (IILyD). Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa
Universidad Nacional de La Pampa
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:I suggest a reflection upon two books that explore a reconstitution and an enlargement of the human and non-human living. Cristina Rivera Garza's El mal de la taiga (2012) and Había mucha neblina o humo o no sé qué (2016) offer imaginative openings that depose the individual subject as a paradigm, and the community as a social group linked to a territory. Those narratives track possible relations between the human and the living, territory and culture, geographic materials and collectivities; but they also display formal creative elements as well as reading and writing processes that are committed with this imaginative opening. The agreement between literature experience and vital confluence calls a regime of sensibilities that combines not only the past and present times but also an experience of virtual times together with a sensitive and cognitive contemporary condition. The enhancement of formal, material and scriptural registers in the production of Rivera Garza inspires an essential hypothesis; that is to say, modulating and renewing the writing is the sine qua non condition to explore new modes of conception of the un(human) subject and the community.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0329-3807
1851-4669
1851-4669
DOI:10.19137/anclajes-2020-24312