Reproductive traits of an estuarine crab, Neohelice ( Chasmagnathus) granulata (Brachyura: Grapsoidea: Varunidae), in two contrasting habitats

Reproductive traits of an estuarine crab, Neohelice (= Chasmagnathus) granulata (Dana 1851), were compared between individuals living in contrasting habitats (mudflat and saltmarsh) of the same population in the brackish coastal lagoon of Mar Chiquita, Argentina. In both habitats, most measures of e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientia marina Vol. 73; no. 1; pp. 117 - 127
Main Authors Silva, Paola V, Luppi, Tomas A, Spivak, Eduardo D, Anger, Klaus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 01.03.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reproductive traits of an estuarine crab, Neohelice (= Chasmagnathus) granulata (Dana 1851), were compared between individuals living in contrasting habitats (mudflat and saltmarsh) of the same population in the brackish coastal lagoon of Mar Chiquita, Argentina. In both habitats, most measures of egg biomass decreased during embryogenesis, including total dry weight (DW) and organic matter (measured as ash-free dry weight, AFDW) per egg, the contents of ash, carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen (per egg and as percentage values of DW), the energy content (estimated from C; both per egg and per mg DW), and the C/N and C/H mass ratios. Egg size, wet weight (WW), and water content (in kg and % of WW), by contrast, increased significantly during the time of embryonic development. These parameters reached significantly higher final (near-to-hatching) values in mudflats than in saltmarshes (egg volume 0.0249 vs 0.0233 mm super(3); WW 36.5 vs 28.8 kg; water content 30.7 vs 23.2 kg per egg or 84.2 vs 80.2% of WW, respectively). Fecundity and reproductive effort did not differ significantly between habitats. Habitat-specific differences in the water content and size of crab eggs are discussed in relation to small-scale local variation in environmental conditions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0214-8358
1886-8134
DOI:10.3989/scimar.2009.73n1117