Performance analysis of Bayesian optimised gradient-boosted decision trees for digital elevation model (DEM) error correction: interim results

Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs), particularly when tuned with Bayesian optimisation, are powerful machine learning techniques known for their effectiveness in handling complex, non-linear data. However, the performance of these models can be significantly influenced by the characteristics of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences Vol. X-2-2024; pp. 179 - 183
Main Authors Okolie, Chukwuma, Adeleke, Adedayo, Smit, Julian, Mills, Jon, Ogbeta, Caleb, Iyke Maduako
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Gottingen Copernicus GmbH 01.01.2024
Copernicus Publications
Subjects
Bayesian analysis
Decision trees
Digital Elevation Models
Elevation
Error analysis
Error correction
Error correction & detection
Grasslands
Land cover
Machine learning
Optimization
Performance assessment
Regression models
Remote sensing
Terrain
Urban agriculture
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs), particularly when tuned with Bayesian optimisation, are powerful machine learning techniques known for their effectiveness in handling complex, non-linear data. However, the performance of these models can be significantly influenced by the characteristics of the terrain being analysed. In this study, we assess the performance of three Bayesian-optimised GBDTs (XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost) using digital elevation model (DEM) error correction as a case study. The performance of the models is investigated across five landscapes in Cape Town South Africa: urban/industrial, agricultural, mountain, peninsula and grassland/shrubland. The models were trained using a selection of datasets (elevation, terrain parameters and land cover). The comparison entailed an analysis of the model execution times, regression error metrics, and level of improvement in the corrected DEMs. Generally, the optimised models performed considerably well and demonstrated excellent predictive capability. CatBoost emerged with the best results in the level of improvement recorded in the corrected DEMs, while LightGBM was the fastest of all models in the execution time for Bayesian optimisation and model training. These findings offer valuable insights for applying machine learning and hyperparameter tuning in remote sensing.
ISSN:2194-9042
2194-9050
DOI:10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-179-2024