Evaluating Sampling Uncertainty in the Quantitative 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Lignin

In recent years, lignin analysis utilizing quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) has attracted considerable interest and has been the subject of numerous studies. However, evaluating the measurement uncertainty of qNMR results of lignin remains a challenge. Specifically, uncertainty origina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioresources Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 2234 - 2242
Main Authors Shrikant Shivaji Pawade, Lauri Toom, Koit Herodes, Ivo Leito
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published North Carolina State University 01.02.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In recent years, lignin analysis utilizing quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) has attracted considerable interest and has been the subject of numerous studies. However, evaluating the measurement uncertainty of qNMR results of lignin remains a challenge. Specifically, uncertainty originating from lignin sampling or subsampling has been overlooked in a large majority of articles. Although lignin is a reasonably homogeneous substance, it is nevertheless a solid, and individual samples collected from the same bulk may have somewhat different compositions depending on mixing and the amount of sample taken. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of sampling uncertainty on qNMR analysis of lignin-based analysis as a case study, with an exclusive focus on the relative quantification method. The results from this study demonstrate that sample-to-sample variations can contribute to approximately half of the variability in actual qNMR measurements. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of sample-to-sample variability was 2.4%. In contrast, the other sources of variability related to qNMR, including measurement, baseline irregularities, and partial peak overlap, caused an RSD of 4.4%. The total variability RSD was 5.0%. In this article, two calculation approaches were presented for evaluating the uncertainty due to sampling from replicate measurement data of different samples, which may be helpful for practitioners in the field.
ISSN:1930-2126
DOI:10.15376/biores.20.1.2234-2242