Pharmacometabolomics of sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study

Sulfonylureas have been a longstanding pharmacotherapy in the management of type 2 diabetes, with potential benefits beyond glycemic control. Although sulfonylureas are effective, interindividual variability exists in drug response. Pharmacometabolomics is a potent method for elucidating variations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences Vol. 27; p. 13305
Main Authors Naja, Khaled, Anwardeen, Najeha, Bashraheel, Sara S, Elrayess, Mohamed A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 17.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Sulfonylureas have been a longstanding pharmacotherapy in the management of type 2 diabetes, with potential benefits beyond glycemic control. Although sulfonylureas are effective, interindividual variability exists in drug response. Pharmacometabolomics is a potent method for elucidating variations in individual drug response. Identifying unique metabolites associated with treatment response can improve our ability to predict outcomes and optimize treatment strategies for individual patients. Our objective is to identify metabolic signatures associated with good and poor response to sulfonylureas, which could enhance our capability to anticipate treatment outcome.BackgroundSulfonylureas have been a longstanding pharmacotherapy in the management of type 2 diabetes, with potential benefits beyond glycemic control. Although sulfonylureas are effective, interindividual variability exists in drug response. Pharmacometabolomics is a potent method for elucidating variations in individual drug response. Identifying unique metabolites associated with treatment response can improve our ability to predict outcomes and optimize treatment strategies for individual patients. Our objective is to identify metabolic signatures associated with good and poor response to sulfonylureas, which could enhance our capability to anticipate treatment outcome.In this cross-sectional study, clinical and metabolomics data for 137 patients with type 2 diabetes who are taking sulfonylurea as a monotherapy or a combination therapy were obtained from Qatar Biobank. Patients were empirically categorized according to their glycosylated hemoglobin levels into poor and good responders to sulfonylureas. To examine variations in metabolic signatures between the two distinct groups, we have employed orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis and linear models while correcting for demographic confounders and metformin usage.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, clinical and metabolomics data for 137 patients with type 2 diabetes who are taking sulfonylurea as a monotherapy or a combination therapy were obtained from Qatar Biobank. Patients were empirically categorized according to their glycosylated hemoglobin levels into poor and good responders to sulfonylureas. To examine variations in metabolic signatures between the two distinct groups, we have employed orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis and linear models while correcting for demographic confounders and metformin usage.Good responders showed increased levels of acylcholines, gamma glutamyl amino acids, sphingomyelins, methionine, and a novel metabolite 6-bromotryptophan. Conversely, poor responders showed increased levels of metabolites of glucose metabolism and branched chain amino acid metabolites.ResultsGood responders showed increased levels of acylcholines, gamma glutamyl amino acids, sphingomyelins, methionine, and a novel metabolite 6-bromotryptophan. Conversely, poor responders showed increased levels of metabolites of glucose metabolism and branched chain amino acid metabolites.The results of this study have the potential to empower our knowledge of variability in patient response to sulfonylureas, and carry significant implications for advancing precision medicine in type 2 diabetes management.ConclusionThe results of this study have the potential to empower our knowledge of variability in patient response to sulfonylureas, and carry significant implications for advancing precision medicine in type 2 diabetes management.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: John Reyes Ussher, University of Alberta, Canada
ISSN:1482-1826
1482-1826
DOI:10.3389/jpps.2024.13305