The students' intentions and satisfaction with the field of study and university

• Published in: Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 176 - 182
• Main Authors: Noorafshan, Ali, Pourahmad, Saeedeh, Sagheb, Mohammad Mahdi, Dehghani Nazhvani, Ali, Dehshahri, Ali, Abdollahi, Manijeh, Mohebbi, Zeynab, Keshtkaran, Zahra, Ahmadi, Afsaneh, Kavousipour, Somayeh, Farahmand, Fariba, Khorrami, Hamid Reza, Soltani, Robabeh, Karbalay Doust, Saied
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Iran Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 01.10.2014
• Subjects: Intention; Medical student; Original; Satisfaction; Intention; Medical student; Satisfaction
• ISSN: 2322-2220; 2322-3561

The present study aimed to find an appropriate method to inform senior high school students to correctly select their academic field of study and their intentions. This is a descriptive-analytic and cross-sectional study. A verified questionnaire was given to a total of 2600 students selected by stratified random sampling method (ten different colleges and entrance year from the 1(st) to 4(th) are considered as the strata). The position of the present field of study (major) among the list of the fields in the entrance exam was asked. The students' methods of familiarity with different fields of study in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), the reasons for their selection, the students' motivation and insistence on studying in the same field and university were asked in the questionnaire. Data were analyzed using independent two samples t-test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Chi-Square test. The most significant references for university field selection were high school teachers, the students' parents and the adjacency of university to one's living place. Also, the results revealed the good reputation of SUMS in the first year and its downward trend during the following years. 59.4% of the 1(st) year students were satisfied with their field of study and SUMS. 31.8% were satisfied with the university but not with their fields of study. 6.4% were dissatisfied with the university but not with their fields of study. 2% of the students were dissatisfied with both their fields of study and university. Dissatisfaction with SUMS and field of study increased little by little so that the results obtained among the students who had entered the university earlier (in the 4(th) year of their study) showed nearly 16.3% dissatisfaction with both the university and the study fields.   The methods for introducing the university are recommended to be revised.