SURGICAL APPROACHES DURING KNEE REVISION ARTHROPLASTY

The authors analyzed the results of different surgical approaches during 144 revision TKA. The need in extension of standard approach appeared in 24 (22,2%) patients: Coonse-Adams in 9 (8,3%), tibial tuberosity osteotomy in 6 (5,6%), quadriceps snip in 4 (3,7%) and combination of two lateral approac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTravmatologii͡a︡ i ortopedii͡a︡ Rossii no. 2; pp. 16 - 21
Main Authors T. A. Kulyaba, N. N. Kornilov, A. V. Selin, P. Y. Zasulsky, V. L. Razorenov, I. I. Kroitoru, A. I. Petukhov, A. V. Kazemirsky, V. L. Ignatenko, A. V. Saraev
Format Journal Article
LanguageRussian
Published Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics 01.06.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The authors analyzed the results of different surgical approaches during 144 revision TKA. The need in extension of standard approach appeared in 24 (22,2%) patients: Coonse-Adams in 9 (8,3%), tibial tuberosity osteotomy in 6 (5,6%), quadriceps snip in 4 (3,7%) and combination of two lateral approaches to the distal femur and the knee in 5 (4,6%) patients with distal femur fracture for simultaneous osteosynthesis and implant revision. During revision TKA method of choice is the standard approach to the knee. Extensive approaches allow better visualization during surgery but may compromise knee function.
ISSN:2311-2905
2542-0933
DOI:10.21823/2311-2905-2011-0-2-16-21