Striking a Balance between Program Requirements and GT Principles: Writing a compromised GT proposal

Glaser’s term “compromised GT proposal” (2001, p.114) refers to the type of Grounded Theory (GT) proposal that is written in order to conform to the requirements of a standardized qualitative research proposal. A GT proposal needs only to supply information on the area of interest, the data source a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe grounded theory review Vol. 8; no. 2
Main Author Sherry L. Xie, Ph.D. Candidate
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sociology Press 01.06.2009
Subjects
classic grounded theory
dissertation proposal
grounded theory
qualitative methodology
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Glaser’s term “compromised GT proposal” (2001, p.114) refers to the type of Grounded Theory (GT) proposal that is written in order to conform to the requirements of a standardized qualitative research proposal. A GT proposal needs only to supply information on the area of interest, the data source and a statement of method to the effect that the researcher begin to collect, code and analyse the data and let the theory emerge. Thus, the proposal may only occupy “a page or two” (Glaser, 2001, p. 111). Whilst being consistent with the methodology, a GT proposal sometimes has to give way to the format specified by a PhD program or committee even though the format was not defined for a GT proposal and in some areas, conflicts with GT principles; for example, the format may require a literature review. This short paper reports on my experience of writing a compromised GT proposal as a first-time GT researcher. It describes how both Glaser’s advice on writing compromised GT research proposals and the characteristics of the substantive area of the proposed research were used to satisfy program requirements while still maintaining GT fundamentals.
ISSN:1556-1542
1556-1550