History’s languages: between analysis and narration

The article describes the diverse narrative forms that historians have used to deliver their texts. From classical antiquity till the 19th century, the prevailing style used by historians was descriptive narrative, which made their accounts a branch of literature. With the emergence of nineteenth-ce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMemoria y civilización Vol. 15; pp. 301 - 317
Main Author Jaume Aurell
Format Journal Article
LanguageSpanish
Published Universidad de Navarra 01.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The article describes the diverse narrative forms that historians have used to deliver their texts. From classical antiquity till the 19th century, the prevailing style used by historians was descriptive narrative, which made their accounts a branch of literature. With the emergence of nineteenth-century historicism, historians began to use an analytic scientific language borrowed from the natural sciences. This approached history to social sciences, combining analytic language with quantitative methods. Eventually, starting in the early 1970s, historians restored classic narrative language, but emphasising the interpretive dimension rather than the strictly descriptive or analytic. The article posits a history of historiography from this perspective and argues that, whatever kind of language he/she uses, the historian has the responsibility to ensure that their language does not veer off either into anti-humanistic scientism or else into anti-referential rhetoric.
ISSN:1139-0107
2254-6367