THE WAYS OF BONE DEFECTS COMPENSATION IN REVISION KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

During 83 revision TKA we found out the need of bone defect compensation in 93,3% of cases. The autologic bone was used in 12 (7,5%) patients, spongeous allograft in 45 (28,1%), femoral head allograft in 10 (6,3%), structural allograft in 22 (13,8%), femoral or tibial sleeves in 17 (10,6%) and femor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTravmatologii͡a︡ i ortopedii͡a︡ Rossii no. 3; pp. 5 - 12
Main Authors T. A. Kulyaba, N. N. Kornilov, A. V. Selin, V. I. Razorenov, I. I. Kroitoru, A. I. Petukhov, A. V. Kazemirsky, Ph. Yu. Zasulsky, V. I. Ignatenko, A. V. Saraev
Format Journal Article
LanguageRussian
Published Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics 01.09.2011
Subjects
bone defects
knee joint
revision arthroplasty
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:During 83 revision TKA we found out the need of bone defect compensation in 93,3% of cases. The autologic bone was used in 12 (7,5%) patients, spongeous allograft in 45 (28,1%), femoral head allograft in 10 (6,3%), structural allograft in 22 (13,8%), femoral or tibial sleeves in 17 (10,6%) and femoral or tibial augmentation blocks in 50 (31,3%). Middle-term results of revision TKA (27 months in average) were evaluated in 57 (68,7%) patients using KSS and WOMAC scores. Positive results were achieved in 48 (84,2%) patients. In 9 (10,8%) cases deep infection developed in different periods of time after surgery. Hence during revision TKA the surgeon should be ready to use different methods of bone defect compensation.
ISSN:2311-2905
2542-0933
DOI:10.21823/2311-2905-2011-0-3-5-12