Yield Performance, Laying Behaviour Traits and Egg Quality of a Crossbred Laying Hen in Alternative Housing Systems

One aim of this study was to investigate a crossbred laying hen line (400 hens) in two alternative housing systems in two replicates between 20-72 weeks of age. One rearing system was deep litter (D) with artificial light. Hens from Group R were housed in a poultry house with windows on deep litter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemical engineering transactions Vol. 107
Main Authors Eszter Zsedely, Klaudia Szalai, Georgina Takács, Erika Lencsés-Varga, Loretta Csilla Szabó-Sárvári, Károly Tempfli
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published AIDIC Servizi S.r.l 01.12.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:One aim of this study was to investigate a crossbred laying hen line (400 hens) in two alternative housing systems in two replicates between 20-72 weeks of age. One rearing system was deep litter (D) with artificial light. Hens from Group R were housed in a poultry house with windows on deep litter and access to a runway without artificial light. Birds were fed ad libitum with a concentrate layer feed (18.0 % protein, 11.6 MJ). The egg production was influenced by the housing system. Lower average egg weight was observed in Group R. The feed consumption was also lower here, but the FCR was better compared to D. Floor egg did not cause any problem in the examined systems. The shell strength decreased with age in both systems. However, the rate was higher in Group D. The albumen height and HU value were higher in Group R at the end of the experiment (72nd week of age). Some differences were found in the fatty acid profile between the two housing systems. Another goal of the study was to observe the behaviour patterns of animals kept under different conditions. Behavioural traits were monitored for 100 hens in total on the two farms that applied different housing technologies (50-50 birds with or without outdoor access). Birds with outdoor access showed 0.23±0.81 aggression-related traits per hour, whereas chickens without outdoor access produced 0.15±0.76 of the same traits (p>0.05). Hens with outdoor access showed 2.30±4.65 activity-related traits, whereas, for hens without outdoor access, 0.72±1.83 observations were recorded per hour (p0.05) in the two groups. In conclusion, the housing system has a complex effect on the assessed crossbred laying hen line.
ISSN:2283-9216
DOI:10.3303/CET23107021