Fruits and vegetables at the supply center of Bahia, Brazil: why not just supply, but also loss?

Food loss is a global challenge with significant economic, environmental, and social implications. In Brazil, it is estimated that fruit and vegetable losses range between 30% and 35% from production to the final consumer. This study analyzed the extent of fruit and vegetable loss and its determinan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSemina. Ciências agrárias : revista cultural e científica da Universidade Estadual de Londrina Vol. 45; no. 5
Main Authors Márcio Vasconcelos Luckesi, Adriana Lúcia da Costa Souza, Denise Nunes Viola, Pedro Paulo Lordelo Guimarães Tavares, Sandra Cristina Carvalho Oliveira, Ryzia de Cassia Vieira Cardoso
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Universidade Estadual de Londrina 01.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Food loss is a global challenge with significant economic, environmental, and social implications. In Brazil, it is estimated that fruit and vegetable losses range between 30% and 35% from production to the final consumer. This study analyzed the extent of fruit and vegetable loss and its determinants at the Supply Center of the State of Bahia (CEASA-Bahia), Brazil, taking into account the diversity of sales establishments. A cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted using questionnaires administered to sellers at the Salvador Supply Center in Bahia, Brazil. The sample consisted of 132 sellers, representing three categories: stalls, stones, and boxes. Over 85% of the sellers had not received any training in food handling. Precarious facilities and insufficient conservation technologies were observed, with only 12.9% of sellers having refrigeration facilities. Although 56.1% of the sellers denied experiencing losses, a weekly loss of 26.30 t of vegetables and 127.4 t of fruit was estimated, representing 2.26% of the acquired amount. In absolute values, this corresponds to over 150 t of wasted food. There was no policy in place at the Center to prevent or reduce food loss, with only timid initiatives such as donations (28.8%) and discounts (6.8%). The findings highlight the potential for implementing programs aimed at preventing food losses.
ISSN:1676-546X
1679-0359
DOI:10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n5p1391