Antibiograms of select anaerobic bacteria over 10 years

• Published in: The Journal of immunology (1950) Vol. 210; no. 1_Supplement; pp. 241 - 241.20
• Main Authors: Sterner, Rosalie, Shannon, Samantha, Estes, Lynn, Norgan, Andrew, Schuetz, Audrey
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.05.2023
• ISSN: 0022-1767; 1550-6606
• DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.210.Supp.241.20

Abstract Antibiotics are critical complements to the immune response in combatting infection. Anaerobic bacteria are increasingly common causes of infection, and antibiotic resistance of anaerobes has been rising. Most laboratories do not perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes, and even fewer have compiled antibiogram data. Here we investigated antimicrobial susceptibility results of anaerobes from January 2012 to December 2021 obtained from inpatients at Mayo Clinic using reference agar dilution testing. Actinomyces (60–70 isolates annually), Bacteroides fragilis (30–80), Finegoldia magna (40–60), and Cutibacterium acnes (70–110) were included. Penicillin, clindamycin, metronidazole, ertapenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and moxifloxacin were tested. Clinical and Laboratory Standards (CLSI) breakpoints were followed. B. fragilis showed ≥90% and Actinomyces 100% susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and ertapenem. All F. magna and >95% B. fragilis were susceptible to metronidazole. The most striking fluctuations in percent susceptibility from year to year were observed for clindamycin, with Actinomyces ranging from 66–79%, B. fragilis 34–67%, and F. magna 47–85%. In the absence of local anaerobe antibiograms, providers may refer to such antibiogram data to guide empiric anti-anaerobic therapy at their institutions. In conclusion, anaerobe antibiotic susceptibility patterns must be monitored to ensure appropriate antibiotic empiric therapy and stewardship.