Abstract 9695: Characteristics, Treatment, and Mortality of Patients Hospitalized for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors in China

Abstract only Introduction: Previous studies found that a substantial proportion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with no standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking) at admission, had unexpected higher...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 146; no. Suppl_1
Main Authors Guo, Weihong, Wang, Yunfeng, Tian, AoXi, Liu, Jiamin, Zhang, Haibo, Li, Jing, Hu, Shengshou, Li, Xi, zheng, xin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 08.11.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only Introduction: Previous studies found that a substantial proportion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with no standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking) at admission, had unexpected higher mortality compared with those with SMuRFs. However, little is known about what contributed to the excess risk of SMuRF-less patients. Methods: This study used a two-stage random sampling design to create a nationally representative sample of patients admitted with STEMI in China, from 2001 to 2015. We compared patient characteristics, treatments, and in-hospital mortality rates between SMuRF-less patients and those with SMuRFs, and established stepped mixed effect models on in-hospital mortality, to explore the potential contributors to different mortality risks (if exist). Results: Among 16541 patients included (aged 65±13 years, 30.0% women), 3288 (19.9%) were SMuRF-less. Compared with patients with SMuRFs, SMuRF-less patients were older (69 vs 65 years, p<0.001), and presented with more severe clinical conditions (mini-Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score; 151 vs 138, p<0.001). SMuRF-less patients were less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (17.3% vs 28.8%, p<0.001), as well as dual antiplatelet therapy (59.4% vs 77.0%, p<0.001), β-blocker (78.3% vs 85.7%, p<0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (49.9% vs 68.1%, p<0.001), statin (69.9% vs 85.1%, p<0.001). Meanwhile, SMuRF-less patients had higher in-hospital mortality (18.5% vs 10.5%, p<0.001). Such difference was largely attenuated after adjusting for baseline characteristics (OR 1.45; 95%CI 1.29-1.64), while disappeared after additionally adjusting for in-hospital treatments (OR 1.04; 95%CI 0.91-1.19), particularly angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker and statin. Conclusion: For the one-fifth patients with STEMI who had no SMuRFs the excess in-hospital mortality was associated with their relatively suboptimal treatments, highlighting the need for evidence-based therapy in SMuRF-less patients during hospitalization.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.146.suppl_1.9695