An External Acetabular Alignment Guide Decreases Positional Variance

• Published in: Surgical technology international Vol. 43; p. 273
• Main Authors: Wadhwa, Harsh, Warren, Shay I, Oladeji, Kingsley, Finlay, Andrea K, Huddleston, James I, Amanatullah, Derek F
• Format: Magazine Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 15.12.2023
• Subjects: Acetabulum - anatomy & histology; Acetabulum - surgery; Adult; Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 1090-3941
• DOI: 10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1735

Certain patient and operative factors limit accurate estimation of acetabular component positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to determine whether an intraoperative external alignment guide decreases variance in acetabular component positioning. Adult patients who underwent primary THA from 2014-2018 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were navigation, robot-assisted surgery, and inflammatory, post-traumatic, or avascular arthritis. One surgeon used an external guide while the second surgeon resected osteophytes and utilized available anatomical landmarks for positioning. Anteversion and inclination, variance, "safe zone" positioning, operative time, and hip instability were assessed. Multivariable regression models were used to examine effects on primary and secondary outcomes. 409 patients were included, of which 182 underwent component placement with landmarks only. Patients undergoing component placement with landmarks only were younger (p=0.002) and more often smokers (p=0.016). After multivariable risk adjustment, use of the external alignment guide was independently associated with 2.7° higher anteversion (CI: 1.6° to 3.8°) and smaller anteversion variance (-0.3, CI: -0.6 to 0.1) compared to landmarks only. It was independently associated with 3.2° higher inclination (CI: 2.0° to 4.4°), but there was no difference in inclination variance (-0.1, CI: -0.3 to 0.2). The external alignment guide was independently associated with a 14-minute shorter operative time (CI: 9.6 to 18.7) and smaller operative time variance (-0.9, CI: -1.2 to 0.6). Use of anatomical landmarks alone was associated with increased likelihood of safe zone positioning but lower precision and longer operative time. While this study was limited by lack of randomization and its retrospective nature, an acetabular positioner may be preferable to palpable or visible anatomy alone for acetabular component placement.