DOGME, CLIL, BYOD: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES IN MODERN EDUCATION

• Published in: Zhytomyr Ivan Franko state university journal. Рedagogical sciences no. 1(116); pp. 137 - 151
• Main Author: Melniichuk, V.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 30.03.2024
• ISSN: 2663-6387; 2664-0155
• DOI: 10.35433/pedagogy.1(116).2024.12

The fast development of society and technology, the increasing connection between Ukrainian and European societies, and a lot of other processes in education modernization encourage the search for a fast and effective way to learn a foreign language. This study is the result of such seeking in the scientific field and pays special attention to the analysis of innovative approaches in foreign language learning, focusing on Dogme, CLIL and BYOD methods. The history of the specified methods of organizing the educational process, their origin, significance, and founders are examined in detail. It was determined that these methods deviate from traditional teaching strategies, opening up new perspectives for teachers to improve the quality of education and improve existing traditional teaching. The analysis shows in detail the positive aspects: authenticity, a large amount of speaking practice, individualization of the educational process, stimulation of creativity in Dogme, development of language and subject skills, active speech and interaction, readiness for intercultural communication, promotion of motivation, flexibility and adaptability in CLIL, personalized learning and efficient use of resources, flexibility and availability in BYOD. However, negative points were also identified, such as lack of consistency in studying the material in Dogme, difficulties with a low level of foreign language proficiency in CLIL and the issue of personal data security in BYOD, which emphasizes the importance of a judicious choice of method depending on the specific goals and tasks of learning. The similarity of Dogme, CLIL and BYOD is outlined by highlighting the following common features: increasing motivation and activity of learners, integration, stimulation of critical thinking. The general conclusions of the study emphasize the need for further scientific studies, including the implementation of the mentioned methods in the school system and the development of own methods based on innovative approaches.