Peace agreement (reconciliation) in civil and administrative jurisdiction: a comparative aspect of the study

• Published in: Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія Право Vol. 1; no. 80; pp. 197 - 202
• Main Authors: Lazur, Ya. V., Zaborovskyy, V. V., Cherevko, P. P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 22.01.2024
• ISSN: 2307-3322; 2664-6153
• DOI: 10.24144/2307-3322.2023.80.1.29

The article is devoted to a comparative legal study of the institution of settlement agreement (conciliation) in the fields of civil procedural and administrative procedural law. The main purpose of the article is to highlight the significance of the settlement agreement in civil and administrative processes. Attention is drawn to the fact that when a settlement agreement is concluded and approved by the court, the parties have the right to independently choose a way out of the conflict situation, while the court is released from the obligation to review the merits of the case for which proceedings have already been opened. The value of the settlement agreement is to encourage the parties to voluntarily fulfill their obligations, thereby reducing the burden on enforcement agencies. Therefore, the right to conclude a settlement agreement in administrative and civil processes is an important procedural tool that contributes to the successful protection of the rights and interests of the participants in the process and the parties to the case, as well as relieves the court’s activity in considering court cases. A comparison of the normative and legal regulation of the settlement agreement by the norms of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine is carried out. The commonality of legislative approaches in solving such issues as who can conclude a peace agreement (reconciliation) is noted; the possibility of the parties to go beyond the scope of the dispute when concluding a settlement agreement (conciliation statements); availability of a written settlement agreement (reconciliation) of the parties; the court’s duty to explain to the parties the procedural consequences of approving a settlement agreement (reconciliation); the court’s obligation to check the terms of the settlement agreement (reconciliation) before approving them; fixing the terms of the settlement agreement (reconciliation) in the court decision, which simultaneously closes the proceedings in the case; the presence in most cases of identical reservations regarding the impossibility of approving a settlement agreement (reconciliation) of the parties, etc. On the other hand, distinctive features of the normative regulation of the settlement agreement and the reconciliation of the parties in civil and administrative proceedings, respectively, are noted. Based on this, it is proposed to improve domestic legislation in the field of civil and administrative jurisdiction.