Early or late? The role of genotype phenology in determining wheat response to drought under future high atmospheric CO 2 levels

• Published in: Plant, cell and environment Vol. 45; no. 12; pp. 3445 - 3461
• Main Authors: Jiang, Duo, Mulero, Gabriel, Bonfil, David J, Helman, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.12.2022
• Subjects: Carbon Dioxide - metabolism; Droughts; Genotype; Triticum - genetics; Triticum - metabolism; Water; wheat; cultivar; drought; genotype phenology; CO2; yield
• ISSN: 0140-7791; 1365-3040
• DOI: 10.1111/pce.14430

The combination of a future rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO ]) and drought will significantly impact wheat production and quality. Genotype phenology is likely to play an essential role in such an effect. Yet, its response to elevated [CO ] and drought has not been studied before. Here we conducted a temperature-controlled glasshouse [CO ] enrichment experiment in which two wheat cultivars with differing maturity timings and life cycle lengths were grown under ambient (aCO approximately 400 μmol mol ) and elevated (eCO approximately 550 μmol mol ) [CO ]. The two cultivars, bred under dry and warm Mediterranean conditions, were well-watered or exposed to drought at 40% pot holding capacity. We aimed to explore water × [CO ] × genotype interaction in terms of phenology, physiology, and agronomic trait response. Our results show that eCO had a significant effect on plants grown under drought. eCO boosted the booting stage of the late-maturing genotype (cv. Ruta), thereby prolonging its booting-to-anthesis period by approximately 3 days (p < 0.05) while unaffecting the phenological timing of the early-maturing genotype (cv. Zahir). The prolonged period resulted in a much higher carbon assimilation rate, particularly during pre-anthesis (+87% for Ruta vs. +22% for Zahir under eCO ). Surprisingly, there was no eCO effect on transpiration rate and grain protein content in both cultivars and under both water conditions. The higher photosynthesis (and transpiration efficiency) of Ruta was not translated into higher aboveground biomass or grain yield, whereas both cultivars showed a similar increase of approximately 20% in these two traits at eCO under drought. Overall, Zahir, the cultivar that responded the least to eCO had a more efficient source-to-sink balance with a lower sink limitation than Ruta. The complex water × [CO ] × genotype interaction found in this study implies that future projections should account for multifactor interactive effects in modeling wheat response to future climate.