Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in coordinate based fMRI meta-analyses using the Fail-Safe N

The importance of integrating research findings is incontrovertible and coordinate based meta-analyses have become a popular approach to combine results of fMRI studies when only peaks of activation are reported. Similar to classical meta-analyses, coordinate based meta-analyses may be subject to di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inbioRxiv
Main Authors Acar, Freya, Seurinck, Ruth, Eickhoff, Simon B, Moerkerke, Beatrijs
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Cold Spring Harbor Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 14.09.2017
Subjects
Bias
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Meta-analysis
Statistical analysis
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The importance of integrating research findings is incontrovertible and coordinate based meta-analyses have become a popular approach to combine results of fMRI studies when only peaks of activation are reported. Similar to classical meta-analyses, coordinate based meta-analyses may be subject to different forms of publication bias which impacts results and possibly invalidates findings. We develop a tool that assesses the robustness to potential publication bias on cluster level. We investigate the possible influence of the file-drawer effect, where studies that do not report certain results fail to get published, by determining the number of noise studies that can be added to an existing fMRI meta-analysis before the results are no longer statistically significant. In this paper we illustrate this tool through an example and test the effect of several parameters through extensive simulations. We provide an algorithm for which code is freely available to generate noise studies and enables users to determine the robustness of meta-analytical results.
DOI:10.1101/189001