The Pragmatic Comportment Compass: Rethinking projectification in public sector projects

This study explores the relationship between public sector project managers and their organizations' formal project management processes. Utilizing Heidegger's concept of ‘practical comportment,’ we develop the ‘Pragmatic Comportment Compass,’ which identifies four primary modes of this re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProject leadership and society Vol. 5; p. 100152
Main Authors Rowe, Kevan M., Whitty, Stephen Jonathan, Wheeldon, Anita Louise
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study explores the relationship between public sector project managers and their organizations' formal project management processes. Utilizing Heidegger's concept of ‘practical comportment,’ we develop the ‘Pragmatic Comportment Compass,’ which identifies four primary modes of this relationship: to use, manipulate, circumvent, and suffer. Based on qualitative data from a focus group of nine experienced project managers in the Australian state government, our findings reveal a tendency to prioritize the public good over strict protocol adherence. This results in adaptive strategies that respond effectively to complex public service realities, ensuring project progress. Our findings challenge the conventional definition of projectification, proposing an alternative that emphasizes the importance of discretion and strategic flexibility. We align this alternative with the principles of street-level bureaucracy and contingency theory, highlighting the necessity for situational responsiveness and resilience in navigating the bureaucratic and procedural obstacles inherent in public sector projects. •The ‘Pragmatic Comportment Compass' guides managers in navigating project complexities.•Redefines projectification to emphasize adaptive strategies in public sector management.•Effective outcomes depend on discretion and flexibility rather than strict process adherence.•Modes like ‘To Suffer’ highlight enduring constraints while ensuring project progress.
ISSN:2666-7215
2666-7215
DOI:10.1016/j.plas.2024.100152