Hyponatremia and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted for heart failure: analysis of the national inpatient sample

Abstract Background Hyponatremia serves as a well established predictor of mortality for advanced heart failure (1). The aim of this study is to reassess the association between hyponatremia and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) by using a nationally repr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean heart journal Vol. 43; no. Supplement_2
Main Authors Kang, C, Asemota, I, Reyes Pinzon, V, Khamooshi, P, Atluri, R, Soon-Shiong, R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 03.10.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Hyponatremia serves as a well established predictor of mortality for advanced heart failure (1). The aim of this study is to reassess the association between hyponatremia and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) by using a nationally representative sample. Methods We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database collected between 2016 and 2018 to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of HF and stratified the cohort on the basis of presence or absence of hyponatremia. The outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, common associated complications and usage of circulatory support. Results Among 727,629 hospital admissions for HF, 72,824 (10%) of them had an additional diagnosis of hyponatremia. The hyponatremia cohort appeared similar in age and had similar rates of Charlson comorbidity index greater than 4 (71 years vs 72 years and 33% vs 35%, respectively) compared to the non-hyponatremia cohort. The comorbidities more prevalent in patients with hyponatremia included: hypothyroidism (17% vs 21%, p<0.001), liver disease (4% vs 11%, p<0.001) and anemia (31% vs 42, p<0.001). By contrast, dyslipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, smoking status and supplemental oxygen use were comparable in both groups. ADHF patients with hyponatremia did not have higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.98–1.19, p=0.138) when adjusted for comorbidities. Nevertheless, patients with hyponatremia had an adjusted increase in mean hospital charges of 14,731 US$ (95% CI: 11065–18397, p<0.001), length of stay by 2.6 days (95% CI: 2.5–2.8, p<0.001), usage of intra-aortic balloon pump (aOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.50–2.59, p<0.001) and left ventricular assist device (aOR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.639–2.98, p<0.001), and higher incidence of acute renal failure (aOR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08–1.189, p<0.001) and cardiogenic shock (aOR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.42–1.76, p<0.001) in comparison to patients without hyponatremia. Conclusion Multiple clinical variables excluded in the NIS dataset could have impacted the primary outcome. Clinicians who observe hyponatremia in ADHF patients should stay wary of potential side effects and maintain a low threshold to escalate care. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1069