Rewriting Heidegger
Two traps currently ensnare Heideggerian scholarship: the “language trap” and the “being trap.” To avoid them, the text argues we should follow Heidegger’s important indication that movement (aka ex-sistential becoming or Zeit) determines all forms of meaning (aka the significance of things or Sein)...
Saved in:
Published in | Differenz no. 9; pp. 167 - 193 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
2023
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Two traps currently ensnare Heideggerian scholarship: the “language trap” and the “being trap.” To avoid them, the text argues we should follow Heidegger’s important indication that movement (aka ex-sistential becoming or Zeit) determines all forms of meaning (aka the significance of things or Sein). This requires a radical rewriting of the terminology and the structure of Zeitlichkeit in § 65 of Sein und Zeit. The text also argues for moving beyond Heidegger’s early and late formulations of fundamental ontology and into a metaontological ethics that would apply to the economic, social, and political worlds in which we live our daily lives. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2386-4877 2386-4877 |
DOI: | 10.12795/Differenz.2023.i09.10 |