Abstract 16562: Cardiac Device Implantation Post TAVR: Mortality and Rates of Pacemaker Dependency

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is often complicated by AV block requiring pacing, but whether patients recover AV conduction and whether the need for pacing affects outcomes is unknown.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 534 patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic in Roches...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 132; no. Suppl_3 Suppl 3; p. A16562
Main Authors Padmanabhan, Deepak, Eleid, Mackram, Deshmukh, Abhishek, Scott, Christopher, Mcleod, Christopher, Cha, Yong-Mei M, Asirvatham, Samuel P, Friedman, Paul, Greason, Kevin L, Gulati, Rajiv M, Noseworthy, Peter A M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc 10.11.2015
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is often complicated by AV block requiring pacing, but whether patients recover AV conduction and whether the need for pacing affects outcomes is unknown.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 534 patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota between November 2008 and January 2015. Of these, 115 patients had implantable cardiac devices. Data was collected from subsequent device follow-ups to determine pacemaker dependency and percentage pacing.Results44 patients (8.2%) had devices implanted in the immediate post procedural period. The most common indications for implantation were high grade AV block (18 patients) and complete heart block (14 patients). 17/44 (38.6%) patients were pacemaker-dependent at implant and only 4 of these patients were no longer pacemaker-dependent during subsequent followup. The indication for pacing among these four patients was high grade atrio-ventricular block (2 patients), asystole (1 patient) and complete heart block (1). Among non-pacemaker-dependent patients, no significant change in the ventricular pacing percentages was noted over time. Survival was similar between patients who required device implantation post TAVR and those who did not after adjustment for age and gender (HR 0.73 [0.39-1.36], p=ns; figure)ConclusionPatients requiring pacing after TAVR are often pacemaker-dependent at the time of implant. It is uncommon for patients who are dependent at the time of implant to regain AV conduction, but the need for cardiac pacing is not associated with increased mortality.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.16562