The efficacy of compression dressings to reduce haematoma post cardiac implantable electronic devices - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Pocket haematomas are one of the most common complications post cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Objective We explored the use of mechanical compression devices compared to the conventional dressings post CIED implantation, to reduce the incidence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropace (London, England) Vol. 26; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors Nageswararajah, D, Cho, K, Cham, J, Premawardhana, U, Lee, A, Tie, H, Hopkins, A, Nguyen, T, Assad, J, Dimitri, H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 24.05.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Pocket haematomas are one of the most common complications post cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Objective We explored the use of mechanical compression devices compared to the conventional dressings post CIED implantation, to reduce the incidence of pocket haematomas. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and wound scar or healing. Methods Five electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to 1st November 2023, identifying all studies which explored compression dressings post CIED implantation. Data were independently extracted by investigators according to predefined clinical endpoints. We used a Random-effects model for data analysis based on event rates (ER) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Six studies (786 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, with 373 in the compression arm and 385 patients in the control groups across the studies. There was a total incidence of 82 haematomas, of which 24.4% were in the mechanical compression group and 75.6% in the conventional dressings group (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23- 0.57). One study suggested improved wound healing with the compression dressing arm (Manchester Scar Scale 9.5 at 2 weeks for the control group and 7.5 for the compression dressings group). Two studies suggested increased pain scores (using a visual analogue scale) shortly after dressing application. One study suggested improved comfort scores in the compression group compared to the control at 48 hours and 7 days. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests for patients post CIED implantation, the use of novel mechanical compression dressings, when compared to conventional dressings, reduces the risk of pocket haematoma.Forest plot
ISSN:1099-5129
1532-2092
DOI:10.1093/europace/euae102.835