Oral prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa Hereditaria: a systematic review

Epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria (EBH) is a group of rare diseases characterized by a cutaneous-mucosal fragility with the formation of bullae, including the oral mucosa. Therapeutic choices, especially prosthetic rehabilitation, must anticipate the worsening of the limitation of oral opening while...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe International journal of prosthodontics p. 1
Main Authors Mascarell, Salomé, Citterio, Hélène, Le Roux, Énora, Berdal, Ariane, Lescaille, Géraldine, Friedlander, Lisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 14.12.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria (EBH) is a group of rare diseases characterized by a cutaneous-mucosal fragility with the formation of bullae, including the oral mucosa. Therapeutic choices, especially prosthetic rehabilitation, must anticipate the worsening of the limitation of oral opening while respecting the functional and aesthetic expectations of the patients. This review on the oral prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria (EBH) to study the level of evidence and quality of the presented available articles and establish clinical recommendations for the prosthetic management of these patients. An electronic search was done in July 2022 in five databases following PICOTS elements. The quality of the reports was established using the modified Pierson, Bradford Hills, and Ottawa Newcastle scale. Data extracted from 19 case reports for protocolized analysis corresponded to 64 patients and 80 dental prostheses with almost 9 out of 10 patients being completely edentulous. The distribution of EBH types was 84% dystrophic, 10.5% junctional, and 5.5% simplex. The difficulties encountered by the authors synthetized in this review characteristically reflected those most likely encountered in dental practice. Most rehabilitations were implant-supported prostheses (85%) followed by removable dentures (10%) and finally dental-supported rehabilitations (5%). Fixed full-arch implant-supported prostheses represented 76.4% of implant-supported prostheses and this last prosthetic solution described showed the highest scientific quality. In an individualized approach to treatment, we recommend that in cases of total edentulism, fixed full arch implant-supported prostheses are the most appropriate, as they allow the best computer-aided planning, design, manufacture, and fitting of the prosthesis in such a complex clinical context.
ISSN:1942-4426
DOI:10.11607/ijp.8791