Relationships between physical capacity and depression in heart failure patients undergoing hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation vs usual care results of the TELEREH-HF randomized clinical trial

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 42; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Piotrowicz, E, Mierzynska, A, Jaworska, I, Opolski, G, Banach, M, Zareba, W, Kowalik, I, Pencina, M, Orzechowski, P, Szalewska, D, Pluta, S, Glowczynska, R, Kalarus, Z, Irzmanski, R, Piotrowicz, R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 12.10.2021
• ISSN: 0195-668X; 1522-9645
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2694

Abstract Introduction The novel hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) consisting of telecare (with psychological telesupport), telerehabilitation and remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices might be an option to improve both physical capacity and depressive symptoms. Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of HCTR on depressive symptoms and physical capacity in heart failure (HF) patients in comparison with usual care (UC) alone. Methods The present analysis formed part of a multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled 850 HF patients (New York Heart Association class I–III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%). Patients were randomized 1:1 to HCTR plus UC or UC only. Patients underwent either an HCTR program (1 week in hospital and 8 weeks at home; exercise training 5 times weekly) or UC with observation. The psychological intervention in the HCTR group included supportive psychological counseling via mobile phone. The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II) score (cut point for depression ≥14) was used to assess depression and the physical capacity was measured by peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2). Measurements were made before and after a 9-week intervention (HCTR group)/ observation (UC group). Results Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic, clinical characteristics and medical therapy. In HCTR group at entry 23% of the sample (n=88/382) obtaining BDI-II scores ≥14 vs 27.5% (n=107/389) in UC group. The BDI II score at study entry was 9.8±6.6 and after intervention was 9.2±6.6, p=0.016 (HCTR group) vs at entry 10.6±8.2 and after observation 10.0±8.3, p=0.022 (UC group). There were no significant differences between groups regarding ΔBDI II score p=0.992. There was a significant improvement in physical capacity assessed by peak VO2 only in the HCTR group, both in patients with (p=0.033) and without (p<0.001) depression (Table 1). These beneficial effects have not been observed in UC group. Conclusions In heart failure patients, HCTR provided similar reduction of depressive symptoms as UC. Hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation resulted in a significant improvement in physical capacity both in patients with and without depression. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): The National Centre for Research and Development, Warsaw, Poland.