218Different impact of muscle, fat, and bone mass in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 40; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Konishi, M, Akiyama, E, Matsuzawa, Y, Sato, R, Kikuchi, S, Nakahashi, H, Maejima, N, Iwahashi, N, Hibi, K, Kosuge, M, Tamura, K, Kimura, K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press 01.10.2019
• Subjects: Chronic Heart Failure: Peripheral Circulation, Metabolism, Skeletal Muscle
• ISSN: 0195-668X; 1522-9645
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0059

Abstract Background Low muscle mass with or without fat mass is a main component of cachexia in heart failure (HF) and associated with poor prognosis. There is a paucity of data, however, regarding prognostic impact of each component of body composition (i.e., muscle, fat, and bone mass). Purpose We hypothesized that muscle, fat, and bone mass have different impact on prognosis in HF. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 418 patients admitted with a diagnosis of HF (71±13 years, 59% male, 46 and 54% with preserved/mid-range (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40%) and reduced (<40%) LVEF), respectively). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed at stable state after decongestion therapy. Results Mean appendicular skeletal mass index (ASMI) was 6.9±1.2 kg/m2 in men and 5.6±0.9 in women, so that 55% of patients had low muscle mass categorized by the Asian Working Group of Sarcopenia. During median follow-up of 502 days, 163 (39.0%) patients experienced primary outcome defined as death or heart failure hospitalization. Using optimal cut-off of each body component chosen on the basis of a receiver operating characteristic curve and the Youden method, we demonstrated that lower ASMI defined by the cut-off of 6.5 kg/m2 in male and 5.2 in female (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.768, 95% CI: 1.210–2.581, p=0.003) and bone mass (adjusted HR: 1.498, 95% CI: 1.051–2.152, p=0.025), but not lower fat mass (p=0.34), were associated with elevated risk of primary outcome after multivariate adjustment. Kaplan-Meier curves with p value by Log-rank test were shown in figure. In subgroup analysis, negative impact of lower ASMI was significant regardless of sex and LVEF category, whereas negative impact of low bone mass was significant only in 78 female patients with reduced LVEF. Figure 1 Conclusions Indices about muscle and bone mass rather than fat mass had prognostic impact in HF. The impact of each body component may different according to sex and LVEF.