P4738New combined risk score to predict atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFCS) is associated with an increase in adverse events. The scores POAF, CHA2DS2-VASc and HATCH demonstrated a validated predictive to predict AF after CS (AFCS). Purpose To develop and validate a new risk score from the combination of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean heart journal Vol. 40; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors Burgos, L M, Gil Ramirez, A, Espinoza, J C, Seoane, L, Furmento, J F, Miranda, P R, Villalba, L, Cracco, M A, Polero, L D, Baro Vila, R, Berton, F, Navia, D, Benzadon, M N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford University Press 01.10.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFCS) is associated with an increase in adverse events. The scores POAF, CHA2DS2-VASc and HATCH demonstrated a validated predictive to predict AF after CS (AFCS). Purpose To develop and validate a new risk score from the combination of the variables with highest predictive value of POAF, CHA2DS2-VASc and HATCH risk scores to predict AFCS. Methodology We conducted a single-center cohort study, performing a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. The study included consecutive patients undergoing CS between 2010–2016. The primary outcome was the development of new-onset AFCS during hospitalization. The variables of each score were evaluated in a multivariate regression model to determine the predictive impact. Discrimination was evaluated with area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) and calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test. The Youden index was used to establish the best cut-off point for the score. The statistical difference between the ROC curves was evaluated with the method of DeLong et al. Results 3113 patients were included. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery 45%, valve replacement 24%, combined procedure (revascularization-valve surgery) 15%, and other procedures 16%. 21% (n=654) presented AFCS. Variables finally included in the new score were: age (≥75: 2, 65–74: 1), heart failure (2), female sex (1), hypertension (1), diabetes (1), previous stroke (1). The new score presented an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.78–0.80), the rest of the scores presented lower discrimination ability (P<0.001): CHAD2DS2-VASc AUC 0.76, POAF 0.71 and HATCH 0.70. The HL test showed a p>0.05. For the new score, the best cut-off point was 2, with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 65.9%, presenting high negative predictive value: 92.9%. Variables OR (CI 95%) P Age (years)   65–74 3.14 (2.29–4.31) <0.001   ≥75 8.68 (6.32–11.93) <0.001 Female sex 3.36 (2.68–4.22) <0.001 Heart failure 2.45 (1.82–3.31) <0.001 Stroke/TIA 2.33 (1.45–3.76) <0.001 Hypertension 1.68 (1.28–2.2) <0.001 Diabetes 1.72 (1.31–2.25) <0.001 Conclusion From the combination of variables with higher predictive value included in the POAF, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HATCH scores, a new risk system was created to predict AFCS, presenting a greater predictive ability than the original ones. Being necessary future prospective validations.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.1114