Further twists in gastropod shell evolution

The manner in which a gastropod shell coils has long intrigued laypersons and scientists alike. In evolutionary biology, gastropod shells are among the best-studied palaeontological and neontological objects. A gastropod shell generally exhibits logarithmic spiral growth, right-handedness and coils...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiology letters (2005) Vol. 4; no. 2; pp. 179 - 182
Main Authors Clements, Reuben, Liew, Thor-Seng, Vermeulen, Jaap Jan, Schilthuizen, Menno
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London The Royal Society 23.04.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The manner in which a gastropod shell coils has long intrigued laypersons and scientists alike. In evolutionary biology, gastropod shells are among the best-studied palaeontological and neontological objects. A gastropod shell generally exhibits logarithmic spiral growth, right-handedness and coils tightly around a single axis. Atypical shell-coiling patterns (e.g. sinistroid growth, uncoiled whorls and multiple coiling axes), however, continue to be uncovered in nature. Here, we report another coiling strategy that is not only puzzling from an evolutionary perspective, but also hitherto unknown among shelled gastropods. The terrestrial gastropod Opisthostoma vermiculum sp. nov. generates a shell with: (i) four discernable coiling axes, (ii) body whorls that thrice detach and twice reattach to preceding whorls without any reference support, and (iii) detached whorls that coil around three secondary axes in addition to their primary teleoconch axis. As the coiling strategies of individuals were found to be generally consistent throughout, this species appears to possess an unorthodox but rigorously defined set of developmental instructions. Although the evolutionary origins of O. vermiculum and its shell's functional significance can be elucidated only once fossil intermediates and live individuals are found, its bewildering morphology suggests that we still lack an understanding of relationships between form and function in certain taxonomic groups.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/V84-0537HK9H-C
istex:BD26C09FDF42F64ADB8F873053FE4877221C91A7
href:179.pdf
ArticleID:rsbl20070602
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1744-9561
1744-957X
DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0602