Anticoagulation for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND. The authors compared the relative efficacy and safety of low‐ molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between patients with and without cancer. METHODS. By using Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 113; no. 7; pp. 1685 - 1694
Main Authors Akl, Elie A., Rohilla, Sandeep, Barba, Maddalena, Sperati, Francesca, Terrenato, Irene, Muti, Paola, Bdair, Fadi, Schünemann, Holger J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.10.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND. The authors compared the relative efficacy and safety of low‐ molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between patients with and without cancer. METHODS. By using Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews, separate meta‐analyses were conducted for subgroups of patients with and without cancer, and relative risks (RRs) were compared for statistical significance. The methodologic quality for each outcome was assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS. LMWH reduced mortality significantly compared with UFH in patients with cancer (RR of 0.71; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.52‐0.98 [moderate‐quality evidence]) but not in patients without cancer (RR of 0.97; 95% CI, 0.65‐1.46 [low‐quality evidence]). However, the difference in the RR for the 2 subgroups did not reach statistical significance (P = .113). The difference between LMWH and UFH in the effect on recurrent VTE was not statistically significant in the subgroup with cancer (RR of 0.78; 95% CI, 0.29‐2.08 [low‐quality evidence]), in the subgroup without cancer (RR of 0.94; 95% CI, 0.60‐1.46 [low‐quality evidence]), or between the 2 subgroups (P = .367). No data were available for bleeding outcomes, thrombocytopenia, or postphlebitic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS. The current results indicated that LMWH most likely is superior to UFH in reducing mortality in the initial treatment of VTE for patients with cancer. There is a need for more and better designed trials to confirm these findings. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society. Low‐molecular‐weight heparin most likely is superior to unfractionated heparin in reducing mortality in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. The current study indicated that there is a need for more and better designed trials to confirm these findings.
Bibliography:Dr. Schünemann received no personal payments from for‐profit pharmaceutical industry sponsors but, within the past 3 years, he deposited into research accounts honoraria or consulting fees (totaling approximately $25,000 from all sponsors) from AstraZeneca, Chiesi Foundation, Lily, Pfizer, Roche, and UnitedBioSource for development or consulting regarding quality‐of‐life instruments for chronic respiratory diseases and as lecture fees related to the methodology of evidence‐based practice guideline development and research methodology. Institutions or organizations with which he is affiliated likely receive funding from for‐profit sponsors supporting infrastructure and research that may serve his work, but he is unaware of any specific funding that could be related to this work. He also is an editor of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Clinical Practice Guidelines.
This article is based on a Cochrane Review first published in the Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 1. Cochrane reviews are updated regularly as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.
Fax: (716) 898‐3119
Dr. Schünemann is supported by a European Union Marie Curie Reintegration Grant (IGR 42192).
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.23814