Do HIV‐1 non‐B subtypes differentially impact resistance mutations and clinical disease progression in treated populations? Evidence from a systematic review

There are 31 million adults living with HIV‐1 non‐B subtypes globally, and about 10 million are on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Global evidence to guide clinical practice on ART response in HIV‐1 non‐B subtypes remains limited. We systematically searched 11 databases for the period 1996 to 2013 for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the International AIDS Society Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 18944 - n/a
Main Authors Bhargava, Madhavi, Cajas, Jorge Martinez, Wainberg, Mark A, Klein, Marina B, Pai, Nitika Pant
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Co‐Action Publishing 01.01.2014
International AIDS Society
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Co-Action Publishing
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There are 31 million adults living with HIV‐1 non‐B subtypes globally, and about 10 million are on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Global evidence to guide clinical practice on ART response in HIV‐1 non‐B subtypes remains limited. We systematically searched 11 databases for the period 1996 to 2013 for evidence. Outcomes documented included time to development of AIDS and/or death, resistance mutations, opportunistic infections, and changes in CD4 cell counts and viral load. A lack of consistent reporting of all clinical end points precluded a meta‐analysis. In sum, genetic diversity that precipitated differences in disease progression in ART‐naïve populations was minimized in ART‐experienced populations, although variability in resistance mutations persisted across non‐B subtypes. To improve the quality of patient care in global settings, recording HIV genotypes at baseline and at virologic failure with targeted non‐B subtype‐based point‐of‐care resistance assays and timely phasing out of resistance‐inducing ART regimens is recommended.
Bibliography:To access the supplementary material to this article please see Supplementary Files under Article Tools online.
These authors contributed equally to the work.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1758-2652
1758-2652
DOI:10.7448/IAS.17.1.18944